Caroline Flint “In A Sheet” (Again zzz)

We posted about Caroline Flint as a panelist in March 2012. And seven months later in October 2012. Now, after six months, she’s back again. Yawn.

And so because, like the panel selectors at #bbcqt, we simply can’t be arsed, and by popular special demand, we repeat our previous blog posts on the subject. Yawn.

Here you go, with pictures of real credibility and statesman-like poise, we proudly present the boringfest that is Caroline Flint in a Sheet.

Previous “In A Sheet”s include Hugh GrantSally BercowFern Britton, Jane Moore and Gloria De Piero though we do hope this stops here – it’s all gone far too far already.

 

And On The Radio

Thanks to the beautiful and bountiful @doktorb for highlighting #bbcqt will now be in audio format too.

WQE

N

Nobby von #pubqt has already made the obvious comment that with the ability now to consume #bbcqt through TV, Twitter, Text Message and Radio, it won’t be long until there’s a 24-hour intravenous version.

God be Praised.

Open Letter To Sandra Laville and others

An Open Letter to Sandra Laville of The Guardian (sandra.laville@guardian.co.uk and @sandralaville) and Sophie Hoskins, Chief Press Officer of the Crown Prosecution Service (sophie.hoskins@cps.gsi.gov.uk) and Jonathan Collett, Director of Communications of the Press Complaints Commission, jonathan.collett@pcc.org.uk and [I think] @JonCollett).

Dear Sandra, Sophie and Jonathan,

I read with interest an article by Sandra on the front page of today’s printed Guardian and here online in which Sandra informs us of the contents of a “file” now in the possession of Sophie’s organisation.

Sandra informs us that the file, created by one party (“detectives investigating the incident”, “the Met”) was handed to another (“the Crown Prosecution Service”, “prosecutors”, “CPS”) and reports on the contents of that file. Sandra reports a “fact” (my quotes) which is made public in the article that the file contains “no evidence that officers lied”.

I thank Sandra for bringing this fact to my attention as me and the lads down the pub have found the case both interesting, sad and amusing at various times.

I would very much like to hear this fact directly from the primary source, the CPS or Met Police but am having trouble doing so. I can not find this fact on their websites and enclose an example of my searches.

plg

(Note that these websites contain zero mentions of “plebgate” and “Andrew Mitchell”, a strange oversight given the public profile afforded to these words.)

Google and Twitter have also not helped me identify the primary source for this fact. That the fact is not easy to find indicates:

(a) The fact has been published on CPS or Met Police websites or elsewhere but I can’t find it (the most likely).

(b) The fact has not been published on CPS or Met Police websites (quite possible).

(c) The fact is somewhere else officially in the public domain (a printed report perhaps)

(d) The fact is not in the public domain online (hopefully this is not true).

If the fact is public information, may I ask any of you to provide a copy to me or a link to where I may find it? If the fact is not public information, then I think we either have an “information asymmetry” problem or a “breach of security”. ["Information asymmetry" (Wikipedia) is is where different information is provided to different people, a practice which is not compatible with the transparency, openness and accountability of national organisations like the Met Police, the CPS or The Guardian].

If it is a breach of security, would you please let me know the prosecuting authority and where their announcement of the commencement of investigation is?

Many thanks

Mark Adams on behalf of four blokes with a pint of beer

PS Sophie, you are “Chief Press Officer” of the CPS and yet I can not find you on Twitter. As “Chief Press Officer” I can not believe that you do not use Twitter. Jonathan you appear to be on Twitter but do not openly identify yourself as who you are. This feels “covert” to me and surely such behaviour is not compatible with CPS or PCC policies.

#plebgate #laville #cps #pcc #guardian #primarysource #pubqt #wewantthetruth #youcanthandlethetruth

Press Regulation – Time for Civil Disobedience

It’s gone too far.

The Budget is a sacred piece of Government communications. And you know what? It’s shared with “the Free Press” *before* our elected representatives and *before* you and me, Dicko, Marve and DJ Doz from the Rising Sun.

What’s so special about “the Free Press”? you may ask.

Go on, ask.

The answer is that “preannouncing” Government news to “the Free Press” is a cozy, corrupt, slimy, backhanded, untransparent, vile practice which seeks to protect power and influence and does so at the blatant expense of democracy.

We must take to the Streets to protest. We must make our protests heard. It must be outlawed. There must be resignations. This practice is simply not acceptable. And I’m going to eat Dicko’s crisps if he in any way says “It’s OK” because it’s not.

Here’s what happened today to raise the bile – the Evening Standard (or “Lebedev’s Evening Standard”) published the Budget before the Chancellor presented it to the House of Commons.

ESW

I’ll say again: “The Evening Standard Published The Budget Before It Was Presented To The House”. (Well, a bloody lot of it anyway – they obviously had had sight of the whole thing.)

How can we stop this practice? Press Regulation? I should coco. And a reciprocal Politician Regulation please.

#leveson #pressregulation #gizzard

Press Regulation – Now Know Ye

“NOW KNOW YE”, said the Queen on 18th March, “that We by Our Prerogative Royal of Our especial grace, certain knowledge and mere motion do by this Our Charter for Us, Our Heirs and Successors will, ordain and declare as follows: There shall be a body corporate known as the Recognition Panel.”

And so it starts. The “Recognition Panel” exists. The actual document is here> The Royal Charter ! Jonnie Bloke and Dicko down the pub had to TRAWL to find this.  But with some guile and cunning Google won out and we got  #primarysource :

HANDSARD

Now, let’s wait for Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, aka, “The Press” to piss on this.

Press Regulation – The Joke Gets Worse

Now, the Government of the day, a coalition, in alliance with HM Opposition reaches an agreement on Press Regulation.

The media then reports the reaction to this from the media, saying how disappointed/happy they are.

So, the Government of the day and Her Majesty’s opposition, effectively all our democratically elected representatives, reach agreement, as one and go cap in hand to the media barons to seek their approval?

Excuse me ?!?!!???

wq

 

#leveson #pressregulation #gizzards

Press Freedom Is A Real Joke

“The Freedom of the Press” and ”Press Freedom”. Two expressions of one simple concept.

“Real Joke”, “Joke”, “Lie”, “Deceit”, “Misplaced Thinking”, “Crime”. Numerous expressions. All encompassing the concept that press freedom is an incredible waste of time.

Press freedom is promoted (by the Press mostly) by describing it as an “Important principle of democracy”. As such, it is defended (by the Press, mostly).

This grand importance is what makes it such a joke.

In truth, “Press Freedom” is no more important than my freedom to express myself, so why does it have a special place? Where is “Radio Freedom”, “TV Freedom”, “Twitter Freedom”? In context, the phrase is already stupid.

Next, who owns and runs “the Press”. David and Frederick Barclay, Rupert Murdoch, Alexander Lebedev and Richard Desmond, among others, are cited as owners (look at the Wikipedia entry).  Individuals. With agendas. Their overt agendas are to be powerful – owning newspapers is a status symbol. So by definition, their job is to show power by wielding it. And they wield it to engineer the institutions they write about as they wish – to promote or destabilise governments, for example.

This power is real. The way it is wielded is real. “Freedom of the Press” in reality is simply “the freedom for powerful media owners to pursue power agendas”.

More on “Freedom of Expression” and other problems in later blogs.